Data-Driven Environmental Journalism

£30m fund backs habitats in England's protected landscapes

England’s protected landscapes are set for a fresh round of habitat recovery after Nature Minister Mary Creagh announced a new £30 million Wildlife-Rich Habitat Fund on Monday 25 May 2026. According to the government, the money will support restoration and habitat creation across National Parks, National Landscapes and the Broads over the next three years, reaching places from Dartmoor to the Lake District. For Eco Current readers, the headline is not just about scenery. It is about putting public money into the living systems that hold these landscapes together: peat that stores water and carbon, flower-rich grassland that feeds pollinators, and woodland edges that give shelter to small mammals and nesting birds.

parts?

Protected landscapes remain some of England’s most recognisable places, but their wildlife is under pressure. The government says these areas still provide refuge for threatened species including hedgehogs, hazel dormice, water voles and birds such as curlew and turtle dove, even as habitat loss and degradation continue to drive decline. The new fund is designed to address that gap in a practical way. Defra says it will help deliver thousands of hectares of wildlife-rich habitat, with the aim of bringing nature back into places that are already loved by walkers, residents, farmers and visitors. That matters because biodiversity recovery depends not only on protecting lines on a map, but on improving the actual condition of land within them.

One of the clearest examples sits in the Peak District. The Peak District National Park Authority is working with Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, volunteers and contractors to begin restoring more than 80 hectares of upland moorland at Gun Moor. Years of damage have left deep peat dry and wildlife pushed back, so the work now planned includes restoring 24 hectares of wet heath, re-wetting peat and establishing new native woodland on lower slopes. That mix is important. Re-wetted peat can help keep carbon locked in the ground and improve water regulation, while wet heath and native woodland expand the range of habitats available to insects, birds and small mammals. It is the kind of project that shows how restoration works best when it is specific to place, not copied and pasted from one landscape to another.

The structure of the funding also matters. Government details show the Wildlife-Rich Habitat Fund is ring-fenced at £10 million a year from 2026 to 2029, with 36 of England’s 44 protected landscapes taking part in the first year. The money will be delivered through the existing Farming in Protected Landscapes programme infrastructure, and Defra says it sits separately from both the wider farming budget and the current FiPL programme. That should make delivery faster and more locally grounded. Projects are due to be prioritised through protected landscape management plans and Local Nature Recovery Strategies, giving local partnerships a stronger hand in deciding what is most urgent, whether that is peat repair, meadow recovery, woodland expansion or habitat links between fragmented sites.

That local emphasis runs through the response from delivery partners. Mary-Ann Ochota, chair of the Protected Landscapes Partnership, said the value of the scheme lies in how quickly support can reach teams and partners who already know their areas well. Her case is a simple one: restoration works better when it is built on trust between land managers, conservation bodies and communities rather than imposed from the centre. The same point is echoed by the Nature Friendly Farming Network. Its chief executive, Martin Lines, described farmers as essential partners in restoring the habitats that make protected landscapes distinctive. That reflects a wider lesson from recent land management policy: productive farming and habitat recovery do not have to be treated as opposites when schemes are designed well and supported over time.

This announcement also sits inside a larger policy frame. It follows the government’s £90 million species recovery commitment announced in March and forms part of Wild Again: Restoring England’s Wildlife, a wider Defra campaign aimed at halting species decline by 2030. The fund is also tied to two bigger commitments: protecting 30 per cent of land for nature and meeting the Environment Act target to restore more than 500,000 hectares of wildlife-rich habitat by 2042. Those targets are ambitious, and this funding alone will not complete the job. But it does connect two strands that too often drift apart in public debate. Species recovery gets the headlines, especially when beavers or white-tailed eagles are involved. Habitat recovery is slower, less theatrical and often more important, because healthy populations depend on functioning places, not one-off interventions.

The Wildlife Trusts welcomed the funding while making clear that the scale of the challenge remains large. Joan Edwards, the charity’s director of policy and public affairs, said climate change, pollution and land-use pressure have weakened people’s relationship with nature across England’s protected landscapes. Her message was supportive but measured: this is needed investment, and it should be seen as a step towards meeting Environment Act goals rather than the end point. That is a fair reading. £30 million is significant, especially when channelled through existing partnerships that can move quickly, but success will be judged by what changes on the ground. The test over the next three years will be whether restored hectares become wetter, richer and more connected, and whether species that have been squeezed to the margins begin to return in visible numbers. If that happens, the gain will stretch beyond wildlife. Stronger habitats can support cleaner water, healthier soils, more resilient farmed landscapes and better everyday access to nature for the communities who live in and around these places. In that sense, the fund is not just an environmental line in a budget. It is a practical bet that recovery can still be built, field by field, with the right backing.

← Back to stories